How exposed this work is to automation, shown as ranges with the reasoning and sources.
The short version: this role is less exposed to automation, and the bigger shift looks near-term.
It is a sourced range, not a verdict, and the detail is below.
Built on O*NET tasks, BLS pay and projections, and peer-reviewed AI-exposure research. Sources shown.
Data snapshot SNAPSHOT-2026-11-06. How it works
AI / softwarerange 13.0 to 37.0
Physical / roboticsrange 27.4 to 51.4
When the change is likely
Near-term, highlocal demand declining
What to do about it
Use AI to outpace AI.
Strategies to protect your livelihood, most important first.
1
Act within the next 1 to 2 years
Displacement for this role is near-term. Start a concrete reskilling plan now, while you still have income and leverage.
2
Build a financial buffer
Keep 6 to 12 months of expenses and diversify your income, so a disruption is a setback rather than a catastrophe.
3
Add a recognised credential
A certification or license raises the bar against automation and signals value in a tightening market.
Keep the monitor on
Free shows where you stand today. JobBreak Monitor writes your full AI-researched plan and keeps watching, so you know the moment your outlook shifts.
Free
$0
See exactly where you stand.
Full job-risk score & timeline
Task-by-task exposure breakdown
One starter strategy
AI-researched personal plan
Ongoing monitoring & alerts
Current plan
Keep ahead
JobBreak Monitor
$3.99/mo
$29/yr
or $29/yr save 39%
that's about $2.42/mo, billed yearly
Your full researched plan, plus a watch on your job.
Everything in Free
Full AI-researched, cited action plan
Resume-aware personalisation
Re-run your plan any time
Alerts when your outlook shifts
Start monitoring
Secure checkout by Stripe. Cancel anytime.
Which of my tasks are exposed
Coordinate with engineers, planners, field personnel, or other utility workers to provide information such as clearances, switching orders, or distribution process changes.
50.0
Respond to emergencies, such as transformer or transmission line failures, and route current around affected areas.
39.4
Control, monitor, or operate equipment that regulates or distributes electricity or steam, using data obtained from instruments or computers.
39.4
Direct personnel engaged in controlling or operating distribution equipment or machinery, such as instructing control room operators to start boilers or generators.
50.0
Distribute or regulate the flow of power between entities, such as generating stations, substations, distribution lines, or users, keeping track of the status of circuits or connections.
39.4
Manipulate controls to adjust or activate power distribution equipment or machines.
39.4
Prepare switching orders that will isolate work areas without causing power outages, referring to drawings of power systems.
39.4
Monitor and record switchboard or control board readings to ensure that electrical or steam distribution equipment is operating properly.
39.4
Longer, orange bars are more automatable; short green bars are resistant.
What is driving my result
lowers risk
raises risk
Local demand is declining
Task: Coordinate with engineers, planners, field personnel, or other utility workers to provide information such as clearances, switching orders, or distribution process changes.
Task: Direct personnel engaged in controlling or operating distribution equipment or machinery, such as instructing control room operators to start boilers or generators.
How this score is calculated
Map Power Distributors and Dispatchers to its standard O*NET task list (8 core tasks).
Score each task for AI/software exposure (Eloundou et al. 2023) and physical/robotics exposure (an O*NET work-context proxy), each 0 to 100.
The two axis scores are the task averages: AI 25.0, robotics 39.4.
The timeline comes from the higher axis (39.4), shifted for local demand (declining), and seniority. It is read against your remaining working years.
Ranges are about ±12 points. A backtest against real BLS employment change shows the risk ranking holds in aggregate, but individual outcomes are predicted weakly, so results are ranges, never a flat verdict.
Sources: O*NET, Eloundou et al. (2023), GPTs are GPTs, O*NET Work Context, BLS CPI-U, BLS OEWS.
Snapshot SNAPSHOT-2026-11-06. Full method and backtest on How it works.